Vous n’êtes pas connecté.

1

14. 10. 2014, 06:35

Reirei

Débutant

  • "Reirei" started this thread

Messages: 36

Localisation: Australia

Travail: Carpenter/cabinetmaker

  • Envoyer un message privé

Algorithm on exploiting flawed

It seems to me allods is using algorithm to try and catch exploiters. The basics of this algorithm seems to be if you exchange gold for gems and nothing to do with how that gold is earned. We had all sorts of people wrongly accused about 4-5 months ago of exploiting when clearly if accounts where checked no-one had been near an exploit ect and the gold was all earned honestly. Basically want the allods team to actualy check accounts before banning rather then using this system where the algorithm is clearly flawed.having not touched (astral caravan-also called Traderoute) and to be given a perma bann for an exploit I have not been near in any way shape form is very close or is wrongful accusation. Please fix the algorithm as it is clearly flawed and would not wish this banning offence to happen to other honest people simply grinding and exchanging gold for gemshards.
Bunnyz formerly Reirei formerly Dayoffx currently Accendancy scout

2

14. 10. 2014, 09:44

May 22, 2014. It's been less than 5 months.

3

14. 10. 2014, 13:28

Messages: 447

Localisation: In my little corner of YT so stay out of it.

Travail: Pro Afk'r

  • Envoyer un message privé

May 22, 2014. It's been less than 5 months.
Approximately 8 days short of 5 months.

4

16. 10. 2014, 17:24

People are also being banned "for circulating exploited gold from one character, who abused the Astral Caravan gold bug, to another."

Where is the in game crystal ball that tells people they are trading with such a person?

5

18. 10. 2014, 13:23

the whole thing is the result of lazy gamemanagement from gpotato on northamerican server
beeing inactive in such a heavyweight case is absolutely unresponsible...

if they had done this proper they could have most likely identified those which did the exploit and fix the problem at the beginning
but instead of fixing it while it was "little" they let it grow and grow and now we still have the aftermath of all this ***

6

20. 10. 2014, 03:17

Messages: 447

Localisation: In my little corner of YT so stay out of it.

Travail: Pro Afk'r

  • Envoyer un message privé

the whole thing is the result of lazy gamemanagement from gpotato on northamerican server
beeing inactive in such a heavyweight case is absolutely unresponsible...

if they had done this proper they could have most likely identified those which did the exploit and fix the problem at the beginning
but instead of fixing it while it was "little" they let it grow and grow and now we still have the aftermath of all this ***
You can't fully blame Gpotato/Webzin for this. It has been almost 5 months since the first ban for this and quite a few people that were banned the first time, showed proof of not exploiting and got unbanned for it, got rebanned again. If NA did take care of it by closing TR down till there was a fix there wouldn't be this much problem. Also if MY.com would have taken care of it properly the first time there wouldn't be a need for a 2nd wave of bans.

I am sure at the end of Gpotato/Webzin - Allods relationship, they didn't give a flying (insert cuss word here) about who was or who wasn't exploiting it, but to be fair all the info was given to My.com.

Oh and by the way, there was only 1 GM in NA and he also covered customer support so calling him lazy is a bit unfair.

So with that being said...Should we be looking forward to a 3rd wave of bans for something that should have been taken care of a very long time ago??

7

21. 10. 2014, 17:36

the whole thing is the result of lazy gamemanagement from gpotato on northamerican server
beeing inactive in such a heavyweight case is absolutely unresponsible...

if they had done this proper they could have most likely identified those which did the exploit and fix the problem at the beginning
but instead of fixing it while it was "little" they let it grow and grow and now we still have the aftermath of all this ***
You can't fully blame Gpotato/Webzin for this. It has been almost 5 months since the first ban for this and quite a few people that were banned the first time, showed proof of not exploiting and got unbanned for it, got rebanned again. If NA did take care of it by closing TR down till there was a fix there wouldn't be this much problem. Also if MY.com would have taken care of it properly the first time there wouldn't be a need for a 2nd wave of bans.

I am sure at the end of Gpotato/Webzin - Allods relationship, they didn't give a flying (insert cuss word here) about who was or who wasn't exploiting it, but to be fair all the info was given to My.com.

Oh and by the way, there was only 1 GM in NA and he also covered customer support so calling him lazy is a bit unfair.

So with that being said...Should we be looking forward to a 3rd wave of bans for something that should have been taken care of a very long time ago??


this was NOT an offense against piopico, it was an offense agains the "management" of allods NA
as you said, simply disabling TR until the problem is fixed would have prevented ALL further problems

including the exchangerate-madness...

Discussions similaires

Noter cette discussion